Talk:Greatest Hits & More (Helena Paparizou album)

State of article[edit]

Errr, I hope that the state of the article as it is in right now, is still work in progress? Even if it is, I don't really know if wiki allows it to create an article about an album, before it is released, with nothing really known. Robster1983 (talk) 12:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paparizougreatesthits.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Paparizougreatesthits.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:52, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GH status[edit]

I honestly do not feel that this album can be classified as a greatest hits album, compilation is more representative. Just because something has "greatest hits" in the title does not mean that is what it is (most of the time that is just marketing) and the addition of "& more" allows for it to be called a compilation. It lacks all of the characteristics of a gh such as being concise and selective. ALL of her singles have been included regardless of performance and another 50% of the tracks have never even been released as singles (a lot are only random album tracks). The division of the discs into a collection of duets, b-sides, remixes etc also supports the compilation theory, being a collection of hit singles and miscellaneous.GreekStar12 (talk) 22:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I really am with you on this one; it's more like a compilation. But the strange thing is; Wikipedia classifeids a Greatest Hits album right under Compilation Album, and vice versa. Make no mistake: the article about it could use some clearifaction! But even still; Έλενα Παπαρίζου/Elena Paparizou; her record label; or whoever decided to release this object as a Greatest Hits. It's just like «Twelve Deadly Cyns...and Then Some». Or better yet; what to think about «10 Χρόνια Μαζί/10 Xronia Mazi» by Δεσποινά Βανδή/Despina Vandi? It could be marketed as a compilation in some way, yet she/ the record compnay released it as a studio album, eventhough «10 Χρόνια Μαζί - It's Destiny» was more qualified for that title. I really am with you on the fact that this boxset is more like a compilation. But in the end, I guess it's all about how the artist/record company sells it; in this case, a Greatest Hits. :| 「Robster1983」^{☞ Life's short, talk fast ☜} 22:49, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Having looked into her singles collection, I did noticed that her digital download «3 Is The Magic Number», as well as her Swedish songs «Allt Jag Vill» and «Genom Krig Och Kärlek» are missing. Also, her years with Antique are absent from this boxset. On the oter hand, all of her released singles appear on this boxset, including some bonussongs and remixes that might appeal people to buy it (as according to the wiki-standard of a Greatest Hits). So where does it leave us? I still reckon we should follow how the boxset is sold; a Greatest Hits & more (i.e. Greatest Hits, bút wíth extras). 「Robster1983」^{☞ Life's short, talk fast ☜} 00:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The term compilation pretty much sums it up and the title & More allows for a broader characterization. A GH album is a collection of definitive hits that give new listeners a sense of an artist's body of work, this is just a blown up mess of crap that only appeals to a small margin of already established fans, in other words quantity over quality. As for Vandi, that album had two full discs of new material, if containing a relatively minor percentage of previously released material disqualifies an album as a studio album then none of Paparizou's albums would ever be considered as such for example. GreekStar12 (talk) 21:01, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vm 2011 03 28 paparizou 01.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Vm 2011 03 28 paparizou 01.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Vm 2011 03 28 paparizou 01.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paparizou.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Paparizou.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Paparizou.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Greatest Hits & More (Elena Paparizou album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Greatest Hits & More (Elena Paparizou album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]