Talk:Grace Helbig

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grace Helbig article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 10 October 2011 by reviewer Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs).

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

YouTube Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion?[edit]

Does this page deserve to exist? This is a self promotion/advertising space. The subject is not well known or famous. She has a youtube account that has moderate interest and I think she appeared as an extra on David Letterman once for about 3 seconds. This cheapens wikipedia when people use it as a marketing tool to try and appear more well known than they are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.64.36.233 (talk) 18:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since I created this page almost 2 years ago, her YouTube channel has gone from about 80,000 to almost 2 million subscribers, which I believe speaks for itself. I guess the Letterman bit really isn't that relevant anymore, but I don't see how that diminishes the rest of her accomplishments. Did you even read the article?

I can assure you that I am just a longtime fan and not affiliated with Helbig or her employers in any other way. Furthermore, she mentioned in an interview she did recently that she deleted some things from this page that she didn't want to be in it (I am 99% certain that these are her edits: Special:Contributions/74.73.126.223)

I will concede that the article could use a cleanup -- preferably done by someone with better writing skills than me.

If you still want to nominate the article for deletion, you will need to follow the official guidelines.

Lunferd (talk) 00:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(In response to IP... editor) The article is supported by numerous reliable sources specifically referring to this person - how is she not notable? Nik thestunned 14:40, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

section Television cleanup[edit]

The section labeled 'Television', specifically the list of appearances, desperately needs a cleanup so that it reflects significant appearances as opposed to every single time a video camera has been pointed towards her, i.e. C-SPAN taping her walking into the White House Correspondent's Dinner. As I'm only looking at this entry because of an annoying ad next to a crossword and have no familiarity with the subject, I'm uncertain as to what, exactly, is important in terms of this person, and would probably delete way too much. I do believe that Grace Helbig is notable enough to have an article. L.cash.m (talk) 13:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the list is extremely crowded with insignificant "appearances." It's impossible to find what you're looking for. In my case it was "from whence have I heard of this person?" and after slowly scanning the list, I still can't figure it out because of all the detritus. I too am not sure of who this person is and why she is famous, so it's difficult for me to tell what would be significant. Nerg! And cheers! Mogandlola (talk) 16:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is still a problem. The whole article suffers from for the most part just being a series of one sentence paragraphs with weak celebrity magazine style sourcing. The complete list of podcast episodes is also too much for a wiki article. Ashmoo (talk) 12:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relationships[edit]

It is a known fact around Grace Helbig that she is in fact dating Chester See. Nobody has confirmed this but is this somethine we should add to her page?Hippoplumpy (talk) 20:14, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find a WP:Reliable source that gives the information. Then it can be added, and your source cited. See WP:V for more information. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Grace Helbig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]