Talk:Glasnevin

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Reverting to Copyrighted version[edit]

Rwallirl (talk · contribs), please stop reverting this article to the version that contains massive amounts of copied text from http://www.glasnevin-cemetery.ie. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright violations for more information. Thanks. (Also left on your talk page. Please respond.) --EarthPerson 15:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spellings[edit]

Center is the American version Centre the European version and therefore the one that would have been used in the original description of Glasnevin being the centre. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.40.219.198 (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Anachronism[edit]

Great Britain did not exist in the twelfth century. Perhaps a re-phrasing is in question for clarity's sake?

10:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Internal headings[edit]

The article, and the Contents / "jump" list, seem crowded, especially by the History. Could the sub-headings, such as Century names, be listed in a smaller format, and without each 2-3 lines having its own "jump"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.250.203.104 (talk) 01:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Assessment[edit]

With a little more work, and expansion of sections, could be B. SeoR 12:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Easily. More references are needed, a few images, but it could easily be a B-class or higher.FlowerpotmaN·(t) 00:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Writing[edit]

"in the sixth (or perhaps fifth)" is from the article would "in either the fifth or sixth century" be better? 86.42.18.50 (talk) 17:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]