Talk:Giovanni Reyna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WC controversy[edit]

Is the bit about the WC controversy & his parents’ actions really relevant here? Sure let’s keep the part about poor training, but the rest should go on Danielle and Claudio’s pages. 2603:8000:E102:1CDB:9C85:FBA4:AF16:8AAC (talk) 21:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 February 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 13:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Giovanni ReynaGio ReynaWP:COMMONNAME per [1] [2] Joeykai (talk) 03:57, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Overall, Giovanni is still more commonly used --FMSky (talk) 08:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject United States has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject England has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 14:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - my Google search gives me 6.99 million for 'Giovanni Reyna', 4.64 million for 'Gio Reyna'. GiantSnowman 14:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - per Forest site and the above, I think the article is still at the correct title. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Is he really one of the best young players?[edit]

A 2022 article by an American sports company about an American could (probably not though) be considered biased, and he is not so young anymore plus not very good right now. 115.70.87.192 (talk) 09:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]