Talk:Gert Wingårdh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeGert Wingårdh was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 24, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Untitled[edit]

I think this article should be categorized assessed biography. I have written the piece and provided notes with links now that are relevant. Basically all information can be found in these URL sources, and other facts can be found on the Wingårdh homepage which I´ve also provided a link to. OK? Erik031 18:54, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Sweden/Assessment, nice work btw. --Krm500 23:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

De-GA[edit]

GA works through the directive given at Wikipedia:Good Articles, so one cannot just tag them as GA; it should go through the GA process of first being listed at Wikipedia:Good articles/Candidates.

Fred-Chess 19:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)

This article still needs some work.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    There are too many one-sentence paragraphs, you should try and unify them, the article would then flow better. When it comes to manual of style, the lead is too short and you don't have retrieval dates for any of the references.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    You should add some book references, all from the internet and blogs doesn't really make the article trustworthy.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    I saw that the nominator for this article is from Gothenburg, i'm sure you could find at least ONE book about Wingårdh... the article's main problem is that it's not complete, the most important things (career and architectural style) could be easily expanded with a quick search in your local library i'm sure.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    i saw pictures of his shopping mall and his ski resort projects, and they look astounding, aren't there any other buildings that could be photgraphed? Check out Santiago Calatrava's article, even if it is poorly sourced and there's almost no text, you can get a better idea of his style when there are more pictures.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Good luck improving the article!

-Yamanbaiia (talk) 14:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision[edit]


Unbiased information removed and article completed with references. Eckermann2000 (talk) 15:58, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.designbuild-network.com/features/feature508/
    Triggered by \bdesignbuild-network\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 09:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Gert Wingårdh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]