Talk:General Mills/Archives/2016

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:General Mills/Archives/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Rerating General Mills to mid importance. I think some people get confused with what "importance" means, wikipedia .5 defines high importance as "Contributes a substantial depth of knowledge with significant impact in other fields". I do not believe this article qualifies as high importance. Mid importance is defined as "Adds important further details within its field, with some impact beyond it", this seems far more appropriate.

Last edited at 18:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 15:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)