Talk:Gaius Julius Vercondaridubnus

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

possible citation for Lugh and concilia precedents[edit]

It's from early work on Imperial Cult in Britain, by Fishwick (details at link) - available at jstor, to which I've no subscription. I had to transcribe the facsimile:

"The old festival of Lug with his eisteddfod at Lugdunum provided an ideal foundation on which to establish the Roman official religion; and it was an obvious step to reconstitute under Imperial control the traditional annual concilium of the Gallic tribes (cf Caesar B.G. 4.6.5., [et al])." - [1].

Against this earlier statement (which seems a well-informed speculation as far as I can tell), Fishwick's later evaluations seem distinctly cagey, perhaps because there's no firm evidence for Lugh at Lugdunum apart from the name. What d'you think?

I found nothing firmer, but there are lots of sites with names like pagangoatlove or celticsunrise, telling you how to have a rollicking good Lughnasa. As if you didn't already know. Haploidavey (talk) 20:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]