Talk:French battleship Démocratie/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 15:56, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, I'll review this shortly. MathewTownsend (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- reveiw
A very nice article. I made a few minor edits which you're free to revert.[1]
I've only a few comments:
- "She displaced up to 14,489 metric tons (14,260 long tons; 15,971 short tons) at full load. She had a crew of between 739 and 769 officers and enlisted men. She was powered by three vertical triple expansion engines with twenty-two Belleville boilers. " three sentences in a row start with "She".
- "Démocratie 22.7 percent hits," - is there a word left out here?
Otherwise all is fine. will put on hold while you look over my comments.
Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 16:45, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
- Both should be fixed now, thanks for reviewing the article! Parsecboy (talk) 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, summary style and list incorporation:
- a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
- c. no original research:
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
- fair representation without bias:
- fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- no edit wars, etc:
- no edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- pass!
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 19:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)