This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article was created or improved during the VisibleWikiWomen edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in March 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
The second, it's more flattering, but obviously I'm biased, since I'm the one who changed it in the first place - apologies for that! Should there be a new RfC, since this hasn't garnered much response? Sorry and thanks again.--Bettydaisies (talk) 02:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Of the two images listed by KyleJoan above, which better suits the subject in question as primary mode of identification?--Bettydaisies (talk) 00:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The second gives a closer image of the subject's face. The first appears to be shot while talking, which is possibly sub-ideal. There's a good argument to be made for the superiority of a neutral-expression photo, but the article's second photo looks to fit that criteria -- I'd actually suggest the second photo in the article become the primary one, and whichever photo is taken here be put in its current place, but regardless. I'd vote for the second. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 14:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The second is more suitable for a lede image. ~ HAL333 04:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
A.
B._(cropped).jpg)
_(cropped).jpg)