Talk:Floral Shoppe

Further Details

The page needs some additional info on the creation of the album. Inspiration, concept, reviews, and other concepts relating to the production of the album. These are pretty general details because what needs to be added is pretty general. Just overall expansion of the article. Semancion (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2014 (UTC) Quick update: I'll also be adding the translation and pronunciation of the song titles shortly. Semancion (talk) 12:03, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Track List

The tracks were all originally written in Japanese (with the exception of Untitled 1 & 2), wouldn't it be better to write the original Japanese version first, then write the romanized version in the parentheses? The way it is now just seems improper. Semancion (talk) 08:59, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Floral Shoppe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pimedia.org.uk/the-best-records-of-2012

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Cover art change

Does anyone know why the cover artwork was changed? I haven't been able to find any information on this. The article shows two versions of the artwork, but the one it presents as primary is not the original, which a quick google search shows is the version favoured by the vast majority of online sources. —Flax5 18:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

The new cover was added in this edit and the old one here, so it looks like the newer cover was present before. I think the original should be used as the only cover per the template documentation, and because using both covers as "the primary means of visual identification" would violate our Non-free content criteria. Opencooper (talk) 19:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

I can't find a source but the cover does appear to use this very image from the article on Helios, which was uploaded a few months before the album came out. Perhaps they were worried about the license. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

At the time of uploading, the album artwork on the label's website featured a different cover than the one with which the album was popularly associated (this is where I pulled the "new" cover). At the time, I didn't have an official source for the "old" cover, and so I listed it as an alternate cover. Had I done a bit more digging, I would have found that the album's original artwork was here. Anyway, the way I saw it at the time was that both needed to be included to fully understand the article, but one of them (the new one) was considered the official artwork while the original cover was the one by which the album was more readily identifiable. I felt that the album covers were significantly different to the extent that the general guidelines for WP:NFCC#3 would allow for both album covers being displayed on the article. I still find this to be the case, as both (and now the additional cassette artwork) reflect different releases of the album and appear to be significantly different. Semancion (talk) 09:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Original video on youtube is down

the original video is down! we have to add that the video is no longer available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lajkdksfssssssimpsonss (talk • contribs) 14:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

It is mentioned:

The song had over 40.5 million views on YouTube before being taken down on April 27, 2018.

Opencooper (talk) 17:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Lisa Frank 420.ogg

File:Lisa Frank 420.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 04:22, 18 June 2018 (UTC)