Talk:Five Go to Mystery Moor

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

Untitled[edit]

added bannershell

Requested move[edit]

Five Go To Mystery Moor → Five Go to Mystery Moor — I belive that the "T" on "To" should be lowercase. Darth Newdar (talk) 14:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Travellers? - they were gypsies! This is just P.C. orthodoxy.[edit]

The Five heard about *travellers* in this book? - and they followed *travellers*? What nonsense!

They were *gypsies*, not travellers - it's only in bowdlerized, revised, updated, watered-down late editions that you may see them described as "travellers". Let's be blunt about it - many recent editions of Enid Blyton's works are *censored*, pure and simple! But I really don't think Wikipedia is the place to compromise accuracy in the name of political correctness. Whether you approve of the term "gypsies" or not, the fact is that this book is about gypsies - not travellers.

If it is desirable to mention "travellers", it should be done only in the context of discussion about how the books have been "updated" - something which may merit being mentioned, whether or not you are in favour of such updating. But it is misleading to speak about the book in general as if it is about "travellers", which it most certainly is not.

I might consider whether to change this - and perhaps a few of the other Famous Five articles could do with a bit of cleaning up, too, and a bit more detail being added, while I'm at it. M.J.E. (talk) 11:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]