Talk:FedCon

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

I just wanted to say that this page looks like it's an advertisement. With sentences containing such phrases as "Avery Brooks, Kate Mulgrew and many many more" and "FedCon XVIII looks to be yet another winner" , it seems terribly unbaised. Unfortunately, I know NOTHING of FedCon (which is exactly why I looked it up), and I think this needs a tuneup. I hope that someone can help fix this page. --Anglais jardain (talk) 22:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the "Advert"-tag and the "Inappropriate tone"-tage . The phrases mentioned above had been changed a lot before apparently, but I changed some phrases anyway trying to make it look more "appropriate" encyclopedia style, removing double entries and some unnecessary information. I also changed the IMAGE, because an image showing the convention itself is more explaning as an image of one person who might have been there one time. -- LLieven (talk) 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Previous Cons - Update[edit]

Hello, thought I would do something good, and updated FedCon table of former cons. I copied the missing part over from deWP, now I realize that I should have changed some German phrases, words and links first. If it's okay to do this later, I'll do it, but It will take some time. If not, feel free to revert. Thank you --Maresa63 (talk) 12:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done, at least the easy part. Maresa63 (talk) 12:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]