Talk:Faugheen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Racing record[edit]

Faugheen's unblemished racing record is currently shown as 11-0-0. He's only raced 10 times under rules - his first win was a point-to-point race, which is also noted in the box. I'd favour showing his record as 10-0-0, removing his PtP win - we don't normally include those in infoboxes - compare Cool Dawn, only his 17 rules races are noted, nothing of his 12 PtPs. --Bcp67 (talk) 20:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PTP is a similar form of racing to chasing(admittedly not very popular), just like NH bumpers are similar to flat racing. Not every horse on wiki includes the record on their entire career in all type of racing events because either that info is not easily found or the wiki pages contributors took the race record from a website that doesn't includes PTP races(ATR, Timeform). I don't see why his race in a PTP is less worthy of inclusion in his overall record, Wiki shouldn't be used as media reporters who ignore his full record because it sells more papers when saying 10 out of 10. I even saw a recent article in which the journalist only mentioned unbeaten in 9 wins, probably he referred over hurdles but still incorrect as his unbeaten record began with his win over that PTP race.
Therefore my vote is against this as it doesn't do anyone any harm knowing his full record which is also available on Racing Post website, which for the past ~10 years have also recorded every PTP race full results(with comments as well). Maok3 (talk) 21:19, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think you've made a decent case there, and I'll leave the racing record alone. --Bcp67 (talk) 12:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Faugheen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]