Talk:Fairey Fulmar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Fulmar was not based on the Battle, but on another light bomber design. The only thing the Batte and Fulmar share in common is the Merlin engine.

First FAA monoplane?[edit]

Does not the Skua take this title, for which the Fulmar was a replacement? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackburn_Skua]

--62.173.76.218 15:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. Removed that statement.Raoulduke47 12:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taranto Top Cover[edit]

Surely this statement is incorrect, and only Swordfish participated in the raid? ChrisMCau 22:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fairey Fulmar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]