Talk:FC Porto/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Body Kit Pattern Rendering Problem in IE

The "_stripesandshouldersonwhite" body pattern is not rendering color in Internet Explorer browsers.

For example, the template code "pattern_b1 = _stripesandshouldersonwhite | body1 = 2662BC" is not rendering the stripes and the shoulder line in soft blue color, like it was supposed to, appearing gray instead.

The problem lies with alpha channel transparency, which causes rendering problems in IE. [1]

Suggested fix is using 8-bit palette indexed transparency.Tmmm 16:45, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Player table

For the sake or readability during the so called "silly season", I'm moving the complete player table here. As soon as the season start, it can be reinserted in the article.

This is the full squad at the end of the 2004/2005 season. Some players were released after the official presentation on 7 August 2004 at the Estádio do Dragão, and others moved in or out at the January transfer window, yet others are on the move to another clubs on the start of the 2005/06 season.

Number	Player	Position	Previous club
Goalkeepers
99	Vítor Baía	GK	FC Barcelona (1999)
1	Bruno Vale	GK
13	Nuno Espírito Santo	GK	Deportivo La Coruña (2002)
37	Rui Sacramento	GK
Defenders
2	Jorge Costa	CD
3	Pedro Emanuel	CD	Boavista FC (2002)
5	Ricardo Costa	CD/LRD
7	Pepe	CD	CS Marítimo (2004)
8	Nuno Valente	LD	UD Leiria (2002)
15	Leandro	LD	Cruzeiro (2005)
14	Areias	LD	SC Beira-Mar (2004)
Midfielders / Wingers
10	Quaresma	RW	FC Barcelona (2004)
34	Leandro do Bomfim	AM	PSV Eindhoven (2005)
16	Diego	AM	Santos (2004)
17	Bosingwa	DM/RM/RD	Boavista FC (2003)
28	Léo Lima	AM	Marítimo (2005)
33	Raul Meireles	DM	Boavista FC (2004)
31	Ibson	MC	Flamengo (2005)
Forwards
9	Luís Fabiano	CF	São Paulo (2004)
41	Hélder Postiga	CF	Tottenham Hotspur (2004)
77	Benni McCarthy	CF	Celta de Vigo (2003)
23	Cláudio "Pitbull"	LF	Grêmio Porto Alegre (2005)
Manager
	Co Adriaanse		AZ Alkmaar, signed 24 May
	replaced
	José Couceiro		Vitória FC, signed 1 February, resigned 22 May
	Víctor Fernández		Real Betis (Out of contract), Sacked 31 January
	Luigi Del Neri		Chievo Verona - Sacked during preseason (6 August)

Released players that played during the pre-season: Marco Ferreira, Rossato, Paulo Assunção, Edgaras Jankauskas and Bruno Moraes.

Players moving out during the January transfer window: Hugo Leal (loaned to Académica), Carlos Alberto (sold to Corinthians), César Peixoto (loaned to Vitória SC), Derlei (Sold to Dynamo Moscow), Maciel (loaned to Atlético Paranaense), Hugo Almeida (loaned to Boavista FC).

At the end of the season, more player left the club: Seitaridis, Maniche and Costinha will join Derlei in Dynamo Moscow and other players such as Luís Fabiano and Cláudio are said to be on the move.

key: The first letter, L,C and R represent the field position, while D is for defensive and A is for attacking. In the case of the second letter, D stands for defence, M for midfield, F for forward, and W for winger.

^wS 23:17, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

2005-06 preseason team archive


Players that continue ¹
Vítor Baía (G)	Rui Sacramento (G)
Jorge Costa (D)	Pedro Emanuel (D)	Ricardo Costa (D)	Pepe (D)
Nuno Valente (D)	Leandro (D)
Diego (M)	José Bosingwa (M)	Raul Meireles (M)	Ibson (M)
Quaresma (F)	Hélder Postiga (F)	Benni McCarthy (F)	Ivanildo (F)
Incoming players (only confirmed by the club)
Lisandro López (F)	from Racing Club	Luis González (M)	from River Plate
Tomislav Sokota (F)	no contract (from SLB)	Bruno Moraes (F)	loan return from VFC
Paulo Ribeiro (G)	from Vitória FC)	Jorginho (M)	from Vitória FC)
Anderson ²(F)	from Grêmio	Fatih Sonkaya (D)	from Besiktas
Helton (G)	from UD Leiria	Hugo Almeida (F)	loan return from BFC
Bruno Alves (D)	loan return from AEK	Alan (F)	from CS Marítimo
Paulo Assunção (M)	loan return from AEK
Outgoing players (only confirmed by the club)
Seitaridis (D)	Dynamo Moscow	Maniche (M)	Dynamo Moscow
Costinha (M)	Dynamo Moscow	Luís Fabiano (F)	Sevilla FC
Hugo Leal (M)	released	Bruno Vale (G)	CF Estrela da Amadora (loan)
Leo Lima (M)	Santos	Areias (D)	released
Leandro do Bonfim (M)	released	Sandro (M)	released ³
Cláudio "Pitbull"(F)	Al-Ittihad	Nuno (G)	Dynamo Moscow

— Preceding unsigned comment added by WolfenSilva (talk • contribs) 23:10, 24 July 2005‎ (UTC)

Name change

Does anyone have a problem if I change the title to FC Porto or F.C. Porto? This club is known in English by FC Porto (Ef Cee Porto), and that's the title of every club you can find, except from Sporting Clube de Portugal which is the name chosen by the club to be used by UEFA in official competitions. Give me feedback, please. Joao pais 23:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

FC Porto squad

Was trying to fix squad composition and screwed chart, now cannot arrange it back. SORRY!!!

VASCO AMARAL, PORTUGAL (User n.217.129.67.28)

Regarding the Total spending in acquisitions, the previous value was not correct.

"As aquisições de “passes” feitas no semestre findo em 31 de Dezembro de 2007 (incluindo o valor dos respectivos passes e outros montantes directamente relacionados com as aquisições) atingiram o montante global de 25.051.774 Euros, o qual inclui 6.650.000 Euros relativo a aquisição dos restantes 50% do “passe” do jogador Lucho Gonzalez.

Adicionalmente, as aquisições dos “passes” dos jogadores Stepanov, Ernesto Farias e Bolatti ascenderam ao montante global de 15.490.848 Euros, os quais, em conjunto com o montante afecto à aquisição dos 50% do “passe” do jogador Lucho Gonzalez, acima referido, representam 88% do valor das aquisições realizadas no semestre findo em 31 de Dezembro de 2007. Os restantes montantes de aquisições"

Porto invested 25.051.755 Euros and not 15.500.000 euros. The 15,5 M is (as the text states) the value invested only in 3 players: Ernesto Farias, Stepanov and Bolatti. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.154.10 (talk) 17:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Madjer.jpg

Image:Madjer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Fcporto.jpg

Image:Fcporto.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Confusion

There's a big mistake that should be correct, the case that is related with the decision of Porto won't play on next season for Champions League is Apito Final, not Apito Dourado. They are two diferent cases. The same that make Porto loose 6 points this season. See: [2]
Aritajustino (talk) 23:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Superleague Formula templates

I've started a discussion about the use of the Superleague Formula templates on football club articles at Template talk:Superleague Formula following some discussion at Talk:Tottenham Hotspur F.C.. Since this article features the template, your views would be welcome. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:30, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Some Porto's nicknames aren't true

Futebol Clube do Porto isn't known at all as "Colossal"...That feature should be deleted by someone who edits pages. Don't forget that football clubs pages sometimes aren't edited as neutral and objective as they should be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.80.116.162 (talk) 09:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Bias

This article is not neutral because it only mentions the positive things about the club. Why aren't runners-up years listed? Why don't you mention the failure of 2013-14 season? Why does it try to hide Apito Dourado? Why doesn't mention the poor past of the club in terms of titles? 85.246.179.146 (talk) 00:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Mostly because the article is far from being complete (if it will ever be), specially the history section which covers most of the club's title drought years and a few recent disappointing seasons here and there. As for runner-up placings, they are listed, although I never agreed with having this in a "honours" section (the majority of featured articles on football clubs also don't include them). I don't have any problem with being unbiased on an article about the club I – coincidentally – am a supporter of, provided that there are reliable sources to verify all of the facts, positive or not. Parutakupiu (talk) 02:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Move to "FC Porto" proposal

The Portuguese version of the article, the club's official site, the FPF, UEFA, the BBC, Eurosport, Sky Sports and ESPN all use "FC Porto". I've never seen "F.C. Porto" used anywhere but here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sueisfine (talk • contribs) 03:54, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

I support this. SLBedit (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Seeing as the club itself adopted this style, I don't see any reason why the article title should not reflect this. Still, this would imply moving all other club-related pages that also bear the "F.C." style. Should a move request be opened to gather more opinions? Parutakupiu (talk) 19:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes. SLBedit (talk) 19:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FC Porto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100503062002/http://en.archive.uefa.com:80/competitions/ecwc/history/season=1983/intro.html to http://en.archive.uefa.com/competitions/ecwc/history/season=1983/intro.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2017

‹ The template below (Edit semi-protected) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

This edit request to FC Porto has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

He is now an official FC Porto Player. Icarus0093 (talk) 02:27, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 05:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on FC Porto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FC Porto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140427012524/http://www.dn.pt/desporto/porto/interior.aspx?content_id=1446236 to http://www.dn.pt/desporto/porto/interior.aspx?content_id=1446236

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Flag of the Soviet Union (dark version).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)