Talk:Erin Moriarty (actress)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Birthday[edit]

Two sources combine to give us a June 24, 1994 birthday (this says she was 18 in March 2013. this says her birthday is June 24). However this inteview says something about being hired to film before her 15th BDay which would have been in 2009. It is a bit odd to hire actors before June 24, 2009 for a film that debuted at 2013 Sundance Festival film. However, the interview also says that it was a directorial debut and it might have taken things a while to progress on a first film.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:49, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Erin Moriarty (actress). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:23, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Better portrait[edit]

The picture used for her seems very poor in comparison to most articles about a person. It's blurry and she's facing totally away from the camera. Is there not a better usable picture of her? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nebisan (talkcontribs) 12:37, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 August 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Both sides have more-or-less reasonable arguments that are backed by policy, and (as often happens in pageviews-vs.-long-term-significance cases) there's no agreement as to which of those arguments is strongest. No prejudice against renomination if the actress's notability continues to increase. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:39, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Erin Moriarty (actress)Erin Moriarty – The actress is the primary topic. Only one other Erin Moriarty. Page views. Schierbecker (talk) 22:30, 31 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 09:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 08:16, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose based on long-term significance. Oddly enough, I'm familiar with the longtime television journalist, but have never heard of the actress so if you just told me "Erin Moriarty" I would assume the journalist. Obviously the actress has a big fan base but that may be limited to particular demographic(s). – wbm1058 (talk) 18:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – the actress is now clearly primary topic over the journalist. I'm not buying the "long-term significance" claim of the latter. --IJBall (contribstalk) 21:13, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. The actress is absolutely the primary topic per the evidence in the page views and doing a Google Search shows the relevance for the actress. In addition, having a disambiguation page for two entries is not useful or helpful for readers. cookie monster 755 01:03, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per wbm1058. The television journalist has been a presence on the home screen for about 45 years and has been honored numerous times, including nine Emmy Awards. WP:TOOSOON for the young actress to be primary over the veteran journalist. Perhaps in a few years. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 11:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The actress is the overwhelming primary topic with 4,500 views per day compared to 66 for the journalist (that's 98%+). And with only WP:ONEOTHER article, a hatnote is just as good as a dab page for the tiny minority seeking the journalist. Station1 (talk) 18:46, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers and WikiProject Journalism have been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink ( ) 13:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as WP:NOPRIMARY due to conflict of long-term significance vs usage. I just don't see any benefit to anyone by adding ambiguity here. -- Netoholic @ 12:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.