Talk:Enough Said

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 27 July 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Jenks24 (talk) 12:19, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Enough Said (film)Enough Said – Only two things called Enough Said - and the film dwarves the song in notability. Unreal7 (talk) 19:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose as per not enough being said to clarify that the title "Enough Said" is not related to an article on the common phrase "Enough Said". Enough said. GregKaye 20:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose neither is that notable and song and film fans should both be allowed to find what they want. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Neither is the primary topic and the current setup makes it easy to spot incorrect incoming links. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 17:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support film is the primary topic; Wikipedia is not a dictionary, people looking for the common phrase should use a dictionary instead. Peter James (talk) 18:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The film dominates the page views, and we shouldn't be trying to disambiguate every title from any possible use as an English phrase. kennethaw88talk 23:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, film is easily the primary topic. Cavarrone 10:08, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, the phrase "Enough Said" is too ambiguous. Fortdj33 (talk) 02:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC min a what's really a WP:TWODABS situation. Items called "Nuff Said" or other variations don't need to be considered here.--Cúchullain t/c 20:11, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. In the absence of the other topics, any one of the five items listed at the DAB at Enough Said would be a suitable target for a redirect from there. They all need to be considered as possible desired results for this as a search term. When all are considered, there is no primary topic. Andrewa (talk) 22:35, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Enough Said (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 10:44, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I will review this one. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:44, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I could find practically nothing wrong with the prose and layout that is here. However, two things should be added:

  • In Critical response, you have no negative views on the movie. But those do exist, such as this one and this one. You should add another paragraph here.
  • A section on release on home media is missing.
  • Production: You might wanna add that the movie was shot on location. In Los Angeles could also mean in a studio.

That's it, great work so far! You have seven days to adress the issues. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for the review! I think I've addressed the issues you raised. 97198 (talk) 11:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Aaaand, it's a pass :) Congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! 97198 (talk) 13:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Enough Said (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC) –  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  17:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 03 January 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was:  Done (non-admin closure)  samee  talk 17:27, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



– This film is the primary topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a00:23c0:4386:3001:58a6:bc30:33ac:84a1 (talk) 16:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)--Relisting.  samee  talk 18:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.