Talk:Edmundo (footballer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

Could we have some more information on what he's done on the field, rather than off it?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.28.209 (talk) 16:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It appears as if he wrote this himself. "One of the greatest"? Please. There are probably 100 Brazilian players who have played in more than one World Cup, if you can call what Edmundo did as playing, as he appeared for a total of 33 minutes in 7 World Cup matches, hardly a performance worthy of "one of the greatest."

he was one of the greatest, and he still is. If you watch one of his games, you can clearly see how good he still is. Just because he didn't play in the world cup very long doesn't mean anything. The only reason Zagallo left him out was because of his temper and attitude. Soccer-wise he is one of the most skilled players out there.

Also what about his temperament, it should be mentioned how it (might have)influenced his selection on the brazilian team etc. Im also curious how it might have affected his team performance.

It is stated that someone had personal problenms with him, isnt that unqualified. in what way? It seems more like a personal note than a fact. if so i think it should be removed.

Generally more neutral, more facts / history would be nice. less fan based. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.211.210.175 (talk) 11:53, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

playing time[edit]

It seems that this article seems to overlook the great majority of his career. There is only a brief overview of his entire career, and then a synopsis of the last few years. There was a time when he was among the best players in the world, it would be good to work this into the body of the article, instead of a throwaway sentence in the intro. I think we should paint a picture of his abilities (greatness?) and then describe his foray into obscurity. Mostly, I think it's important to describe his accomplishments too. ABart26 (talk) 10:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone wants to clean up the article it would be nice. Here is a useful link: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/columns/story/_/id/994033/the-mavericks:-edmundo?cc=5739 83.185.21.206 (talk) 13:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edmundo.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Edmundo.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 11 April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Edmundo.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edmundo (footballer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]