Talk:Early day motion

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

untitled[edit]

Okay, whoever wrote that last line... thanks for making me laugh. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.49.83.3 (talk) 22:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Debate[edit]

What has to happen for an EDM to be debated in the house? Darren Reynolds 08:03, 21 January 2009

On meaning of 'Tabled'[edit]

We need to be careful with this term. In the US to table a motion is to stop discussing it (until a vote to untable it passes), but in the UK it means to begin discussing it. (I'm told there was a horrible fight at a meeting during WWII where the British were insisting on tabling an issue and the US was insisting that instead if be discussed immediately...which of course were the same thing.) RJFJR (talk) 15:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Table (parliamentary) RJFJR (talk) 15:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"[...]May not be signed by[...]"[edit]

Could someone please clarify the following:

"EDMs may not be signed by government ministers, Parliamentary Private Secretaries or the Speaker of the House of Commons."

Does this mean that the aforementioned parties are not allowed to sign it, or that their signature is not required? ATMarsden^{Talk · {Semi-Retired}} 10:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It means they are not allowed to sign, to quote "Parliamentary Private Secretaries must not associate themselves with particular groups advocating special policies”.--Salix alba (talk): 19:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Early day motion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070324004623/http://www.southhamsfoe.co.uk/node/168 to http://www.southhamsfoe.co.uk/node/168

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]