Talk:Dragonsphere

---

Untitled

Have a question - has anyone ever translated all the Latin-ish phrases that are used by the Soptus Ecliptus? --24.80.110.173 01:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dragonsphere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303173012/http://docs.bmcgroup.com/Atari/nysb_1-13-bk-10176_313.pdf to http://docs.bmcgroup.com/Atari/nysb_1-13-bk-10176_313.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151006163221/http://retroism.com/ to http://www.retroism.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Source

• http://twvideo01.ubm-us.net/o1/vault/GD_Mag_Archives/GDM_AprMay_1995.pdf

Citations for it being a cult classic and having good graphics at the time

No citation is given for it having notably good graphics at the time, and there were earlier adventure games with better graphics that no particular fuss was made over. None of the reviews in the reception section mention its graphics. The citation for it being considered a cult classic does not provide support for this - it simply states that it is available for free on gog and that one reviewer remembers it fondly, despite having forgotten about it until the gog announcement.

Are there better citations for these claims, or should they be removed? 222.152.197.94 (talk) 00:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)