Talk:Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi (series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Raging Blast[edit]

It is way too early to call this a Sparkling instalment. There's nothing that call it as such. The spread only states that it's a game with Sparkling gameplay elements. Plus the title was revealed to be Dragon Ball: Raging Blast not Dragon Ball Z: Raging Blast. So lets just back off for while until more information becomes available. Sarujo (talk) 13:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with holding back with the section. However, when it does get officially announced, a section should be created here, as although the game is not called Budokai Tenkaichi/Sparking, it still has the same gameplay elements. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 22:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i was just on namco bandai's u.k site and i found this http://www.namcobandaigames.eu/en/press/39/ and it says it is part of the budokai tenkaichi series —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.167.70.157 (talk) 17:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since this isn't a direct sequel of the Budokai Tenkaichi Series shouldn't we go ahead and make a seperate page since its already got good information on the game out? deathreaper131 (talk) 17:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If Raging Blast is going to be kept merged into the Budokai Tenkaichi article only because it shares the same gameplay elements as the Sparking series, Infinate World and Burst Limit will be merged into the Budokai series article. Cheers. --UnquestionableTruth-- 02:44, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonball: Raging Blast in game transformations info[edit]

Well there is a video confirmation that there will be in game transformations here :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.178.3.2 (talk) 16:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunetaly, the source is youtube, which is not reliable. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 18:05, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok,so we will wait until bandai will post a post about that.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.178.3.2 (talk) 19:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I do know that Japan decided to drop off the Z in Dragonball Z. This explains why the movie is called Dragonball: Evolution and why this game does not have a Z in it also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Claws019 (talkcontribs) 00:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Playable characters[edit]

Someone's going to need to go ahead and start a separate character list for Raging Blast, since it doesn't contain all the characters in the previous installment. I'd do it myself, but IPs aren't allowed to edit the page (I think) and I'm too lazy to make myself an account. Sorry.

What I suggest doing, though, is (if possible) set it beside the already existing list in the collapsible section, rather than below, and treat it as if it were the first game in a brand new series. 96.228.26.79 (talk) 00:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I noticed that some of the Tenkaichi 3 characters have superscribed "2"s beside them, but the foot notes make no notification as to what they mean... Might want to fix that. 96.228.26.79 (talk) 18:39, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missing 2?[edit]

In the character roster for the series. There is a 2 next to Mid Goku and no explaination. Someone needs to fill it out and fix this. I don't know what it means, or if it should even be there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.100.2.183 (talk) 16:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I pointed out weeks ago, but no one seems to notice the anons. 24.184.180.96 (talk) 05:05, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2 exclusive characters?[edit]

Uh where is the source for this. You say its an interview but that interview isn't provided in the refernces, if you can't show me the link where he said there will be two exclusive character then i'm removing it.Magicdata (talk) 19:49, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SS3 Broly was just announced today in V-Jump. So that is one exclusive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.100.2.183 (talk) 16:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not really Spike copied him from a dimps game thats coming out in japan. Btw your character list has been vandlized.SSJ5 Goku, seriously noobs.I put up a updated list.Magicdata (talk) 04:41, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 4[edit]

Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 4 will no longer be called Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 4 but instead Dragon Ball Raging Blast. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 18:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No joy? When there is some give us a bell asap. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 15:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DATES FOR RELEASE FOR Budokai TENKAICHI 4[edit]

Are they incorrect? It says it's coming out in the UK first? But usually the game comes out in Japan first. Help me out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.13.183 (talk) 20:19, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Ball: Raging Blast Article[edit]

I tried looking up the game, which originally was merged here and found that it was merged with several different articles, such as Dragon Ball, List of Dragon Ball video games, and this artical. This is unacceptible. I also don't believe that this game deserves to be merged with this article due to the fact that it's a spinoff, and not a sequel. So I plan on making it it's own article, as is case of Dragon Ball Z: Burst Limit and Dragon Ball Z: Infinite World. --Ryu (Talk | Contributions) 14:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This puts a little damper on my plans, as I was planing to creat a Raging Blast article after enough reviews were put out, also on the grounds that all the information I added on the game has suddenly vanished from this article entirely. If a Raging Blast article is created now it will most likely be re dirrected by user DBZ Rocks on the grounds of the gameplay elements are too simular to the rest of the Sparking series. But I say gameplay is irelavant. What matters is the real world coverage that gets added. Sarujo (talk) 23:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tenkaichi Tag Team[edit]

Should this game be added to this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.185.93.228 (talk) 02:46, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]