This article was nominated for deletion on 27 December 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This page has been brought to my attention by an email from the subject claiming it contains libellous statements. As I look at it now, I do not see any obvious libel, but it is totally unsourced. --Brian McNeil /talk 10:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
if there is not one already. In that case you could include all the information and opinions you like. As it is when you put in someone's opinions about it in this article is makes it look like everyone hates poor Ms Byrne, which I'm sure is not the case. Steve Dufour (talk) 05:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This controversy saw Byrne's name appearing in various British newspapers, including The Times.
Wow! She's got her name in the papers! Well, as head of a major TV channel, that is not exactly notable. Valetude (talk) 14:44, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
