Talk:Don't touch my junk

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 March 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

A fact from Don't touch my junk appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 December 2010, and was viewed approximately 7,700 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that John Tyner and Charles Krauthammer don't want you touching their junk, but Michael Kinsley wants you to go ahead and touch his, and Wendy Kaminer thinks Krauthammer just wants you to touch someone else's?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/December.

Wikipedia

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mass surveillance Low‑importance

	Don't touch my junk is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I'm seriously questioning the value of this article as wikipedia material. I think this page should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DNJH (talk • contribs) 18:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.74.191.67.11 (talk) 20:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree as well, what a load of rubbish 58.169.224.91 (talk) 21:26, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. We can and do have articles on topics like Strategery, Truthiness, the Internets, and Don't touch my junk. That's part of the fun of it. Stonemason89 (talk) 00:35, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's the funniest Did You Know I've seen... brilliantly worded --Hermajesty21 (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, notability is established by the reliable sources cited. Unless anyone disagrees, I'm going to remove the notability tag. — Hun ter Ka hn 21:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is established? I fail to see how your logic works here. First this phrase has been said long before 9/11. Using "junk" to refer to genitals is fairly common slang. Just because a few people or articles used a word, in this case "junk" in connection with some topic, doesn't usurp that word or phrase's general meaning. This article is like an article that says "Keep the tip" and associating it with getting a takeaway pizza. I could probably find references where "keep the tip" is used in regards to ordering pizza, but the phrase has meaning outside of that narrow scope. Any phrase becomes "notable" under your thinking if a handful of authors use it in connection with some topic. You know what's junk? This article. Jason Quinn (talk) 18:12, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYKSTATS[edit]

While featured on the main page, this article received 7,700 pageviews. Stonemason89 (talk) 03:55, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Don't touch my junk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110323235856/http://www.aolnews.com/2011/03/15/aaron-tobey-student-with-4th-amendment-on-chest-sues-over-airp/ to http://www.aolnews.com/2011/03/15/aaron-tobey-student-with-4th-amendment-on-chest-sues-over-airp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Don't touch my junk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110311213906/http://www.nhpr.org/obrien-applauds-vote-retain-anti-tsa-bill to http://www.nhpr.org/obrien-applauds-vote-retain-anti-tsa-bill

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]