Talk:Deveron Projects

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 9 February 2016 by reviewer Anne Delong (talk · contribs).

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 13 March 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 06:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deveron Arts → Deveron Projects – organisation has changed its name from Deveron Arts to Deveron Projects Deveronprojects (talk) 14:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 06:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: The change of official name is not relevant. Google [1] [2] shows slightly more hits for the new name, but on closer look many of the hits for the new name use only the old name... including the Google sidebar entry itself. It should be noted that nom is a single purpose account and now blocked indefinitely as a promotional username. Andrewa (talk) 06:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing comment: In that there's some evidence of acceptance, and in that any autoconfirmed user could have done this move without raising an RM, and in that nobody else has shown any interest, I'm going to give it the benefit of the doubt and move on. I don't expect any objections, but feel free to drop me a line at my talk page and we'll sort it out. Andrewa (talk) 06:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.