Talk:Dennis Severs' House

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Possible reference[edit]

This interesting blog entry here is by Dennis Severs' niece, and has photos of the house taken in the mid 1990's. There are other entries in her blog that are tagged 18 Folgate Street that have information about the house and its inhabitants, Dennis Severs and Simon Pettet, as well as lots of photographs. I don't know whether it would be allowed in the article, but it is worth noting here at least. 86.133.53.110 (talk) 18:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mary/Marie Celeste.[edit]

The problem with Marie Celeste and Mary Celeste is complicated. Many sources don't understand the difference, including, it would seem, this one. Since the passage works perfectly well without it, and it's a bit of OR, I've removed it. Hengistmate (talk) 22:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]