Talk:Dawn Dickson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion[edit]

I have been informed that this article has been tagged G11 for speedy deletion as it is considered to represent blatant advertising. I do not believe this to be the case.--Ipigott (talk) 16:11, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was tagged and declined more than 12 hours ago. I don't know why you think it's currently tagged. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:13, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COI and promo issues[edit]

Hello Silver seren, apologies that I somehow missed your message. The reason for the COI tag is due to the issues found here. The reason for the press release tag is that the career and books sections are written to present the individual in a favourable light. I note that you have made recent improvements regarding this, however it doesn't yet meet the standard for neutrally-written and encyclopaedic text. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 11:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A COI and/or paid editing issue should have the Template:Connected contributor or the Template:Connected contributor (paid) templates added to the talk page, not to the front of the article. What's wrong with the Career section? The equity crowdfunding information? And what about the books section? It is short and says what the book is about. That's what a books section is for and I don't see how it's overly favorable, it's just neutral. I strongly disagree with your claim on it not being neutrally written at this point, @MrsSnoozyTurtle:. SilverserenC 20:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Silver seren. My understanding is that the COI tag can be placed on the article, especially when there is sockpuppetry involved.
As I stated above, the issue with the Career and Books section is the tone. It all has a feel of WP:PEACOCK, for example "among the first to accept credit cards" (which is also not supported by the source), "it also offers tips to executives, influencers, entrepreneurs " and "to help women find relief". Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:08, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I got about halfway through rewriting the article a while ago, and then got sidetracked. I agree that the second half of the article still needs work; I haven't even checked some of the issues @MrsSnoozyTurtle points out. I do, however, think "helping women find relief" from high heels seems reasonable. If you think of better wording, please do suggest! Cielquiparle (talk) 15:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]