Talk:Davor Džalto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vanity Page[edit]

This does seem like a questionable page. His links and references don't suggest to me that he deserves a wikipedia page more than any number of professors and academics around the world. The fact that some famous institute mentions his name does not, per se, indicate "importance". If this were the case, then anyone who happens to have given a seminar at some famous university would deserve a wiki page, IMHO. BTW, I noticed he is a visiting scholar at Indiana U., whose citation about him doesn't suggest special notoriety. (I should point out that I don't know him, or his work, but just found it odd that he was linked from a page about creativity.) I'd suggest removal, unless better cited evidence can be provided.98.212.165.113 (talk) 19:42, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced this page meets the criteria for wikipedia. External links ether dont work or show personal web galleries of this man. Also brief Google search offers just a few links about him. 11:47, 17 April 2007

I'm not convinced this page meets the criteria for continued inclusion in wikipedia. If anyone feels it's not just a vanity page, please could you cite some references to show the subject's importance. Thanks! Roddyp 10:04, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I find 11 references in Google, only 1 of those to Wikipedia. Includes a website created by the subject, according to the summary info in Google
Based on the content of the article, the person in question does seem significant. Thus, unless the accuracy of the article is disputed, it doesn't appear to be a vanity page. KHenriksson 01:15, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the notice. I don't think this qualifies as a vanity page. NickelShoe 19:51, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

beyond Google references, the subject 'Davor Dzalto' can be found in european libriries, newspapers and magazines with reference: art, art history, philosophy and orthodox theology. Dzalto appears in the major exhibitions of the region.

Honestly, I don’t see any reason to question the article. Even a brief Google search offers links to important contemporary art institutions that contain reference to Davor Dzalto. Check www.flexibleart.net , www.skc.org.yu, www.kunstgeschichte.uni-freiburg.de , www.creemaginet.com , www.veraznanjemir.bos.org.yu , www.ulus.org.yu , www.belef.org , www.lmb.informatik.uni-freiburg.de , www.accea.info... + international organization as Pax Christi – www.paxchristi.net , faculties and official government presentation www.bg.ac.yu/university , www.mps.sr.gov.yu and, finally, sr.wikipedia! where no one questioned it as a vanity page. whitewood 22:57, 7 January 2006

The issue seems to be clarified long time ago, and in the meantime many more credible sources have been cited, so it really seems to me that somebody questions now the content of the page for no apparent reason, except maybe personal dislike. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.46.82.157 (talk) 21:52, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I got to this page following the links from other articles, and I must say that the note at the beginning of the article creates serious prejudices about the article that are, I think, completely unjustifiable. The subject of the article and the article itself are devalued this way without any justifiable reasons. I suggest the note be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.203.130.219 (talk) 16:18, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Davor Džalto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Davor Džalto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional tone tag[edit]

As I took admin action on this page, I leave it to other editors to determine if tag should be restored. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]