Talk:David S. Breslow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 16:21, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that plastics researcher David S. Breslow's interest in chemistry began as a child when he used a chemistry set to make stink bombs? Source: The Morning News. "Breslow, 66, said his interest in chemistry began in New York when he was a boy, after he and a friend inherited a chemistry set. One day they ran out of ferrous sulfide and couldn't make more stink bombs."

Created by Sdkb (talk). Self-nominated at 03:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Article was nominated within 7 days of being created. Well sourced with inline citations throughout. Article is neutral with no copyright violations according to Earwig. The hook is concise, neutral, and very interesting, with it appearing in the article with a source as well. QPQ has been done. This one's good to go. Aria1561 (talk) 06:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Connection note[edit]

I wrote this article back in 2020. Breslow was a member of my extended family, although I never met him and knew quite little about him before I began researching for the article. Given that, plus the fact that there was nothing at all controversial about his biography, I judged at the time that my connection wasn't strong enough to require a COI disclosure. Looking back on it now, having acquired additional experience, I think that was the wrong choice — even though I trusted myself to write objectively about him, others might not have, and I should have disclosed rather than making the call myself. To make amends now as best as possible, I'm adding {{Connected contributor}} here and I'll drop a note at WT:Chemistry inviting a review. (I'm not adding {{COI}} because, per that template's documentation, the article should have a specific, articulatable, fixable problem. Do not apply this tag simply because...there is or was a COI editor, and I do not believe that such a problem exists here.) {{u|Sdkb}}talk 18:31, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]