Talk:Dar Al-Farooq Islamic Center

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Criminal Complaint Report[edit]

@Everymorning: See the criminal complaint doc: here. Note it is WP:PRIMARY so anything pulled from it should be qualified as such. I'd suspect this might receive more attention in some WP:RS that we could then cite. However, citing primary sources isn't necessarily out of bounds, as long as it respects WP:OR. Regards, Shaded0 (talk) 23:30, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. I always wince when I see someone cite social media as though it were a reliable source--if it had been a tweet from a news agency or newspaper I might have kept it in the article. Every morning (there's a halo...) 23:31, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Everymorning: Here we go. Granted, may make more sense focusing on the mosque in this article, rather than piling on more info about the one incident. Seems a bit undue. Shaded0 (talk) 02:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Hari and MOS:GENDERID[edit]

A series of unregistered editors (who I will notify of this discussion) have been editing to misgender or remove the name of Emily Hari, the convicted bomber. Per MOS:GENDERID, we should be using living persons' most recent gender identification as related by reliable sources. The Star Tribune source is sufficient for this purpose. One IP suggested that we should wait for legal recognition, but such recognition is not a prerequisite for Wikipedia properly reflecting a person's gender identity and name. Could editors who are reverting please explain what policy or guideline they are following? Firefangledfeathers (talk)