Talk:Cymbopogon bombycinus

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Cymbopogon bombycinus is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Cymbopogon bombycinus vs. Cymbopogon nardus?[edit]

The page title is Cymbopogon bombycinus, but the text keeps mentioning Cymbopogon nardus. Which is this article about? As far as I have dug up, they are separate species. Cymbopogon nardus exists as a separate article, albeit a stub. @Pagliaccious:, it looks like you did the bulk of the editing here, can you explain what's going on? Nessie (talk) 03:57, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nessie Yeah, sorry about that. Reviewing the sources I cited, all of them refer to "bombycinus" not "nardus", and the taxonomy section also refers to "bombycinus", so I must have somehow made a mistake naming the plant in the article in the beginning, then replicated the mistake. The article itself is about Cymbopogon bombycinus, not Cymbopogon nardus. Sorry for the trouble. Pagliaccious (talk) 14:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Glad it was an easy fix, @Pagliaccious:. Keep up the writing! Nessie (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]