Talk:Cromaclear

NPOV Tag[edit]

After looking through the article, I found little justification for an NPOV tag. Additionally, it appears that there is no discussion about the possible NPOV issue. I am therefore removing the NPOV tag. Ecopirate 19:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article seemed wrong, as if at least some parts came from a marketing brochure. I thought "it's been checked before, maybe it's ok" but then I did a bit more searching and found the ChromaClear white paper on a NEC site. A lot of the page is copied from that white paper. That's not neutral and it might even be a copyright violation.

After scrutinizing, I fail to see serious issues. Please use {{POV-statement}} for sentences, then detail issues here. This will help address them in a timely manner. - Roy Boy 03:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So what's the difference?[edit]

Reading over the description, and looking at the image of the mask, I can't see any difference between this and a modern rectangular-mask shadow mask screen. Maybe there is one, but I can't find it in this article. Maury Markowitz (talk) 16:17, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

this article mentions the technology in passing. It appears to be nothing more than a trade-name for a slot-mask design. This was very common in the TV market since the 1966 Porta-Color. I assume it was not as common in the computer world due to the need to use circular pixels, but I can't be sure. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate image[edit]

I was a technician at a CRT factory for most of the 90s. Like others, I'm not seeing any major techincial difference between Chromaclear and any other slot-mask CRT. Additionally, the illustration of the brick slot style is a created .gif, not a photo, and appears to be significantly misleading--there should be black matrix lines not only between each set of 3 colors, but between each color. If a CRT were built as shown, it would be nearly impossible to avoid mislanding that caused distinctly visible color errors.

Unless I'm missing something, there doesn't appear to be enough difference between Chromacolor and any other 90's slot mask CRT to justify a separate article.

Sevesteen (talk) 01:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cromaclear. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060909191750/http://www.necdisplay.com/support/css/Techlibrary/cromaclear_white_paper.htm to http://www.necdisplay.com/support/css/Techlibrary/cromaclear_white_paper.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]