Talk:Crash: Mind over Mutant/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Overall I find this article very good and interesting, it covers most if not everything one would want to know about the game. Good work.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   There seems to be some references missing in the second and third paragraph of the lead section, as well as further down in the "Plot" and "Audio"-sections. A rule of thumb is there should be at least one reference after each paragraph. If the information is referenced elsewhere, copy or move that reference to after the paragraph.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Some sentences could be OR, see 2A.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   The resolution of the cover image is to large, should be easily fixed though.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   On hold for now, but just fix these small issues and the article should be passed in no-time! --MrStalker ^(talk) 12:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

   Okey, the issues has been fixed except for one single reference, but I don't think it's anything to worry about. Just keep improving the article. Good work! --MrStalker ^(talk) 22:38, 16 November 2008 (UTC)