Talk:Comparison of alcopops

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Smirnoff Ice = Stimulant?[edit]

Smirnoff Ice is listed as containing a stimulant; however, I can find no official sources to support this classification. Perhaps this should be changed?

Need to be merged[edit]


I've added some of TVX and Woodys.

Spirit, Hop And Grape Co. - Shag lager was made by this group, but as far as I know no alcopops.

Caesar is a cocktail based drink. I personally wouldn't class it as an alcopop, even if it vodka based. I would class it more as a mixer, as it is available in a non-alcoholic version - I think.

I couldn't find much info on Spoof so have no idea what it is blended with or which spirit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexmate (talkcontribs) 03:09, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

D/C?[edit]

There's a field called "D/C*" but nowhere in the article does it seem to explain what that means (and I have no clue). Please add? --98.217.14.211 (talk) 09:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a sold-in field which has apple-juice as the header, seems wrong  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.82.126.241 (talk) 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

Long Drinks?[edit]

What about Long Drinks? In Finland the "original" long drink is usually made from gin + grape soda, but also other variants exist.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comparison of alcopops. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]