Talk:Clinical trials unit

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.clinicaltrialsunit.com/. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2010041410027571.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

This article was made in by the makers of www.clinicaltrialsunit.co.uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spchjok (talk • contribs) 14:33, 14 April 2010

Why do clinical trials units exist?[edit]

This seems to be be the big question which isn't answered by this article at the moment! I can see two possible reasons:

Economic; it might not be economic for many small- to medium-sized drug companies to keep the skilled staff in-house
Scientific; a clinical trial supervized from outside the devolping company might get a more favourable hearing than one organized entirely in-house.

Do we have any clear evidence to support either of these hypotheses? Physchim62 (talk) 00:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regulation around the world?[edit]

I've found plenty of information on CTUs outside of the UK (see, for instance, [1]) but have not found any information on what regulatory bodies, if any, govern them. It would be great if this could be expanded with sourced content explaining who oversees CTUs elsewhere in the world. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clinical trials unit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110512110149/http://clinicaltrialsunit.com/ to http://www.clinicaltrialsunit.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]