Talk:City Lights/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Smarojit (talk · contribs) 01:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC) Will review it in the next couple of days. --smarojit HD 01:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, excellent work on one of the best films of all-time. Just some minor issues before I pass this:

Release, reception and legecy
  • No in-line citation for "..he demanded higher ticket prices compared to talkies."
  • Same for this review: "On the other hand, Alexander Bakshy of The Nation was highly critical of City Lights, objecting to the silent format and over-sentimentality and describing it as "Chaplin's feeblest"."
  • Finally this: "Chaplin's original "Tramp" suit from the film was donated by him to the Museum of Natural history of Los Angeles County." [Also, why is this statement in this particular section?]

--smarojit HD 04:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. The section is reception and legacy and it seems appropriate to mention him donating the suit in the legacy of the film at the end?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

--smarojit HD 14:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]