Talk:City Investing Building/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JackFromReedsburg (talk · contribs) 01:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i will be reviewing this article. Expect comments soon. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 01:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

All images are properly licenced, the article is well written, and it covers all major parts of the building.

This article meets all GA criteria, so I'll be promoting it. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 02:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]