Talk:Citizen Joe

"Threads"

The previous episode is "Full Alert" and is followed by "Reckoning Parts 1 and 2". Threads is after those events. Changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.46.79.245 (talk) 02:54, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Jack telling Joe's wife everything

All that the episode shows is Jack approaching and talking to Joes wife, it doesn't say that he reveals all the details of the Stargate Program. He probably just gave her some cover-story explanation, like some new secret government project in non-radio communication, since in the past they've never revealed information to the public, except when they absolutely had to. JBK405 15:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Actually, if you listen carefully, when Jack sits down, the first thing he says is: "It's all true." While he may not have disclosed every detail, it would seem that he's confirming at least everything Joe told her. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.218.240 (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Better picture???

Okay its a great pic that captures an important moment in the show... (Joe learning Daniel dies/ascends.) But it is very dark, anyway some one can get a better picture, or lighten up the picture we have now? EnsRedShirt 09:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Continuity issues

I wanted to add a trivia note, maybe a sentence in the article, addressing the obvious continuity error between this and previous episodes; pointing out the clear retcon with Jack experiencing Joe's life. Eight years without even mentioning it, especially in several episodes which feature significantly into his psyche, is just too much for viewers to believe, especially when it's such a glaring security risk and there's so many attempts by Air Force officers to find mental diseases throughout the series. However, whenever I try to write the entry it just seems so...well, it's just so fannish and POV (I think because it is fannish and POV). I was hoping maybe there was an interview where a writer/producer/director/actor mentions how it doesn't make sense, or an article pointing out the many instances where Jack specifically would have mentioned (or at least thought about) the connection, or something like that, so that it's not just my own personal opinion (No matter how right I think I am, I don't add speculation to articles). Does anybody know of a proper source? JBK405 02:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

About continuity

From what I understood of the episode, Jack's stone was always kept at the SGC, which means that he could only see Joe's life when working at the SGC. I only started following Stargate SG-1 in season 6-7, so i might've missed episodes where he was under a lot of psychological stress at the SGC, but I don't think Joe's life had any major impact on Jack's life, except for the fact that it was "relaxing". But then, it's odd it hasn't been mentioned before, or that Jack didn't seek any help for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.248.212.95 (talk) 13:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Citizenjoestargate.jpg

Image:Citizenjoestargate.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Citizen Joe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070926222008/http://media.dave.tv/sites/stargatesg1/screenplays/s08e15.PDF to http://media.dave.tv/sites/stargatesg1/screenplays/s08e15.PDF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)