Talk:Circle Health

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 2 June 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Circle Health Ltd to Circle Health. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 2 June 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 14:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Circle Health Ltd → Circle Health – No reason to have Ltd in the article name, in common with other company articles. There is no clash or confusion that could be caused by the rename 10mmsocket (talk) 10:19, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

agree - Rwendland (talk) 10:49, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. we usually leave off the "Limited" unless needed for disambiguation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

COI tag (February 2022)[edit]

It looks like recent contributions, which added promotional content and removed critical content, might have been the work of somebody with a conflict of interest. That editor has been advised of both the COI and sockpuppetry policies. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 10mmsocket - no conflict of interest; I'm a trade title journalist. (talk) 19:20, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What’s the trade title? And is it funded by the private healthcare lobbying industry? Because that would represent a conflict of interest. (And would explain your edits to insert advert-like text into the lead and remove all the widely-reported critical comment from the lead.) Cambial — foliar❧ 21:15, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary sources[edit]

We need WP:SECONDARY and reliable sources to establish that an award given to a company is at all notable. Wikipedia is not a promotional tool and an obscure award's own website does not establish content as encyclopaedic. Similarly, PR-oriented trade sites with chumbox-style articles are not a reliable source. Cambial — foliar❧ 18:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]