Talk:Chuck Benbrook

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

FOIA emails[edit]

Is there some reason that no mention has been made of the FOIA requests made against Benbrook? There's been two requests both of which show him collaborating with the organic industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.155.84.27 (talk) 23:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forced Resignation from National Research Council Position[edit]

This article completely lacks any mention of criticism against his objectivity, reports he's been involved in that have been refuted in the peer reviewed journals by objective authors, his repeated lack of full disclosure of his ties to the organic industry, and his forced resignation from the NRC-NAS position as Executive Director of the Board of Agriculture. Benbrook's version of his resignation did not comport with evidence from the NAS. His WSU position was also basically in name-only and a means of funneling more industry funds to him. ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.186.61.58 (talk) 01:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you have reliable references covering this, feel free to add them here, and begin a discussion about how you think they should be incorporated into the article.Dialectric (talk) 01:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Monsanto/Johnson Trial[edit]

Just dropping by but I note that Dr. Benbrook was a witness for the plaintiff in the sensational glyphosate trial where a jury found Monsanto guilty of causing a man's cancer. This is worthy of further investigation and inclusion here as Dr. Benbrook's objectivity is in question as is his expertise in qualifying the effects of pesticide exposure and cancer. 81.97.100.208 (talk) 12:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to include content in the article, provide wp:reliable sources that support your position. Just being a witness in a trial may not be sufficiently notable for inclusion unless his role in the trial received significant coverage.Dialectric (talk) 13:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]