Talk:Chembra Peak

India: Kerala / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is a bad paraphrase of several tourism websites. Perhaps somebody can clean it up to something more useful and unique? James084 14:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

height of chembra[edit]

Several other sources in the internet, which includes some .gov.in sites like http://keralatourism.gov.in/index.php?source=desti&destid=6636014&catid=&zone=1 seems to think that the height is infact 2100m . I've personally been to the place and have verified it to be the truth from official records. Sad that I cannot quote any reference materials.

The article cited for chembra peak's height as 2000m is questionable. Its an outdated article with a probable typo and can be found in this link: http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/yw/2003/03/15/stories/2003031500900300.htm [Strangely the Wiki article is not referring to this as well.]

I understand that Wiki's policy says "Truth does not matter ... only verifiability does!" and now that Hindu article has published wrong information, Wiki seems to just continue with this.

Personally, I am not much familiar with Wiki and would like to check with the editor before suggesting / making modifications. chembra is 2050 m tall — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:5600:16:B70B:50D8:EB15:7B10:D8CD (talk) 18:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Sandeep —Preceding unsigned comment added by Usandeep (talk • contribs) 04:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chembra Peak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071118083638/http://www.keralam.com/keralam_travelandtour_touristattarctions.htm to http://www.keralam.com/keralam_travelandtour_touristattarctions.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]