Talk:Chandpur District

Bangladesh Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article falls into the work area of the Geography workgroup of WikiProject Bangladesh

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Freebirds, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on May 4, 2013.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Religious composition[edit]

This is as of 1991? Is there nothing more up to date? Seems like it would almost be irrelevant because it is so old. Cleanelephant (talk) 21:52, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~"Out of date" tag has been added to the article. Cheers, Freebirds ^Howdy! 14:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

I have updated the population and area statistics from this source. However, I have left the out of date tag in place because much of the article's data is still out of date. Cheers, Freebirds ^Howdy! 14:19, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting[edit]

A lot of it isn't consistent. Some use the type of institution number of institutions format and some are in bullet form. They should all be one. I think the bullet form would be best because it is confusing to read the lists separated by commas. Cleanelephant (talk) 21:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have done quite a lot of work attempting to clean up this article. It seemed like a total mess when I first read it. I have taken your suggestion on board Cleanelephant, re- using bullet points in lists (rather than have the lists separated by commas). I have also added Wiki-Links, and have tried to reference information by adding citations. (I may have gone slightly mad with the time and energy I've dedicated to this article; however I really wanted to clean it up.) Please feel free to give feedback etc, as I am always keen to learn from more experienced Wiki editors. Regards Jihadcola (talk) 17:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Jihadcola[reply]

listing[edit]

Do we really need a list of every type of thing that this district has? I see no need to list Bazaars and then NGOs', etc. It seems like a desperate grab to include more content. I would vote that the truly notable items in these lists have a stub or article created for them and the rest removed. --RichardMills65 (talk) 22:47, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And now among the oldest articles listed as requiring copy editing. If only there were some copy to edit, it's pretty much just one big inventory. VєсrumЬа ►TALK 20:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have performed a copy edit of this article in order to improve the overall cohesion and fix the poor grammar. However, I still agree that this article is in desperate need of more relevant information. Freebirds ^Howdy! 14:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Chandpur City of Hilsha.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:53, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]