Talk:Cathar yellow cross

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anyone interested in creating an article on the cross of Toulouse ? John Bunberry 00:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put it on my to-do list Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:32, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Cathar?[edit]

I think this should be merged with Cathar. Upon reading the article, only the second section has any information that would not be included in the main article, and it is fitting to place it there. The only information that is novel to this article is:

  1. The picture of the yellow cross
  2. The note of the forced yellow cross wearing

Both are minor points not warranting a whole article rehashing the Cathar plight Amicuspublilius 15:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not very keen on this idea - there is enough here for this as a handy sized piece which is interesting enough to warrant it's own piece - with a reference / link over from the main Cathar page. I'm not sure those subject to wearing a cross would find this a minor piece of information! The article doesn't re-hash the whole Cathar article - but merely sets the piece in a context for the general reader. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article is also full of typos and POV wordings. I'm sure members of the Church that were the majority at the time would find the POV to be more than a minor piece of information. I must point out again that there is not more than a paragraph of information here, tops. Amicuspublilius 04:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please help by correcting the typos and POV - this way we all get a better article! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 06:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Layout messed up[edit]

I'm not sure where the rounded cross is supposed to go, but where it is put right now, it is not clear what it belongs to or what it is....someone with knowledge please correct it! da_baitsnatcha 15:53, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]