Talk:Camp Shorabak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attack destroyed/damaged 8 of 10 Harriers based there[edit]

No mention that Harriers were based there since this summer. Since the unit was essentially wiped out, remains to be seen if USMC feels it safe to base jets there again. Viet Cong mortar attacks never destroyed this many aircraft in one attack, and they never got onto the airbase at Bien Hoa.

[1] Marine Attack Squadron loses eight Harrier jets in worst U.S. air loss in one day since the Vietnam War September 16, 2012 Posted by David Cenciotti in Military Aviation. ...On Friday Sept. 14, at around 10.15 p.m. local time, a force of Taliban gunmen attacked Camp Bastion, in Helmand Province, the main strategic base in southwestern Afghanistan. About 15 insurgents (19 according to some reports), wearing U.S. Army uniforms, organized into three teams, breached the perimeter fence and launched an assault on the airfield... The attackers fired machine guns, rocket propelled grenades and possibly mortars against aircraft parked next to the airport’s runway. Two U.S. Marines were killed in the subsequent fighting whereas eight of 10 AV-8B+ Harrier jets of the Yuma-based Marine Attack Squadron (VMA) 211 were destroyed (6) or heavily damaged (2): the worst U.S. air loss in one day since the Vietnam War.Redhanker (talk) 04:22, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The "Operational units" section has only recently been created and contains only units where a reference could be provided and at the moment is mostly all British, the American units are displayed on the Camp Leatherneck article and the main details about the attack on the 14th Sept is on the 14 September 2012 Camp Bastion attack article. The section does currently have a "This section requires expansion" notice on it explaining it is nowhere near complete. Gavbadger (talk) 11:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

Why, in the "Occupants" section of the infoxbox, have former occupants been struck through? The dates of their occupation are provided, making it clear that they are no longer incumbent. The strikethroughs therefore appear to serve a different agenda. danno_uk 21:45, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The strike through's were added first before I had the actual dates, I just never got round to remove the strike through's. Gavbadger (talk) 23:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Camp Shorabak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Camp Shorabak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]