Talk:Callao Cave

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Southeast Asia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Callao Cave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slight inaccuracy[edit]

The article says "a group of scientists headed by Armand Mijares... published their studies in the scientific journal Nature". This is inaccurate.

In fact, it was Mijares' team who discovered the fossils. But he was not the head of the research team that published the article. The lead author of the article was Florent Détroit of the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris.

They had different roles: Détroit is a paleoanthropologist. Mijares is a paleoarcheologist. It was Détroit's team consisting of French and Australian anthropologists who analyzed the data and came up with the conclusions of the paper. It was Mijares' team consisting of graduate students of UP NIGS who found and unearthed the specimens. Both teams and both roles are equally important.

I would credit Mijares for the discovery of the fossils. I would credit Détroit for realizing that it was an entirely new species, for leading the entire scientific team, and for being the first author of the study.

I would say both of them working together, leading their respective teams, discovered Homo luzonensis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.190.106.10 (talk) 05:57, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]