Talk:Cabinet of Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka High‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cabinet of Albania which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 19:47, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New embed Cabinet[edit]

I have created new embed template for cabinet members table at {{Sirisena cabinet}}, This was the reason because the contents on this article are apparently messed up along with the table so I decided to move the table into template space to allow users to edit the table without messing up the surrounding contents. MONARCH ♔ 20:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@PrinceSulaiman: Please explain how the contents were "apparently messed up". From what I can see the Template:Sirisena cabinet uses the same wiki code as the content you removed. The only difference is in the presentation, you have put the MPs of the party you support, UNP, first and relegated the MPs from the party you hate, the SLFP, last. In the same way you added controversial content to Mahinda Rajapaksa, leader of the SLFP, and removed controversial content from Ranil Wickremesinghe, leader of the UNP. Have you heard of WP:NPOV?--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 12:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Obi2canibe: I don't understand what do you mean by “relegated”? I have only added the MPs to the top from party that has most seats in the Parliament, See SLMC, JHU, ACMC they are the coalition of UNP, I have only organised the list with the alliance that has the most seats. In the template at {{Sirisena cabinet}} you can clearly see that I have stated “You're welcome to make any necessary changes in the below table”, That means anyone can edit, reorganise the list or update the list. I will not interfere it per as good faith, My explanation on “apparently messed up” there are surrounding contents on the article, and I want to make sure that the table is not affected by the contents because the cabinet is “jumbo” sized which makes editors much difficult to see the full table contents, So this is only the reason I moved the table to different page, yes the table has exact same data from Cabinet of Sri Lanka.

I don't hate SLFP, I have contributed to SLFP's pages, I do understand WP:NPOV and I already told you that when it comes to Wikipedia, I don't stand by party that I'm affiliated with, I only will act according to the policies and guidelines, Anything that violates WP:NPOV and core policies and guidelines, the other users are free to warn me on what I'm doing. The one you're doing is to grill me on my “edits” because you think that I hate Rajapaksa (He too killed your people, Which I oppose his actions), and I'm not only the one here that hates him, there are many other people who didn't like him just because he is cruel. Everyone has the right to write a history on his actions that caused disharmony between communities. So the people who were blinded by Rajapaksa propaganda would realise what actually he has caused to them (such as his frauds, murder cases), The Wikipedia will give them the answers for these who have been searching for the truth. PS: Don't ping me on PrinceSulaiman, It doesn't work. ♔ MONARCH Talk to me 20:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorting by number of seats in Parliament is not objective and makes no sense to the independent reader. I'm afraid in most of your edits on Wikipedia you have shown partiality to the UNP, this article is no exception. I still don't see how the surrounding contents get "messed up".--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 12:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]