Talk:British Rail Class 730

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the British Rail Class 730 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Trains: in UK / Passenger trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

"/2" must NOT be linked[edit]

The /2 of Class 350/2 must NOT be linked at all, because it just redirects you to the page, which I do not want to happen on my Wikipedia experience. Please stop placing the /2 in the 4 braces, only put it in the last 2 please. Thank you. Edgar Searle (talk) 08:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Edgar Searle: First, regarding your remark "I do not want to happen on my Wikipedia experience", see WP:OWN. Second, since Class 350/2 works just fine, WP:NOTBROKEN applies. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

5-Car Livery[edit]

The 5-Car units are for London Northwestern Railway and thus the image showing one in West Midlands Railway livery is inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.212.21 (talk) 10:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good point - and do we really need diagrams with two extra cars? Enotayokel (talk) 21:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clear template[edit]

@Redrose64 the reason I removed the template was because of how the page looked on larger screens - on the screen I use, that template pushed the references to underneath the infobox, resulting in a huge amount of empty space Danners430 (talk) 18:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, that's the point. You get proper use of columns, using the page width efficiently; but without the {{clear}}, the refs are compressed into the left-hand part of the page. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aventra or Landmark Class?[edit]

WMT have confirmed in a tweet that they intend to call their 730s the Landmark Class… should this form the name for the whole article instead of Aventra, or should it remain as Aventra with Landmark Class being used in the operator/named units section instead? Danners430 (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]