Talk:British Best All-Rounder

Average speed vs average of speeds?

Unless things have changed, this competition is based on the average of speeds rather than the true average speed. That is, the average speeds for the 50, 100, and 12 hours are added and divided by 3 whereas the average speed should be determined by adding the distance covered in the 12 hour and 150 miles, and then dividing by the sum of the time for the 50 and 100 mile events plus 12 hours. Simply averaging the three speeds places undue emphasis on the shorter events, that is, the event tends to favor those who do quite well in the 50 and 100 while the 12 hour specialist is usually out of luck. There was at least one time in the 1960s that the rider with the highest true average speed was "beaten" by a rider whose average of speeds was higher.

This is a common mathematical mistakeWschart (talk) 01:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Article suffers form lack of citations

It really cannot stay the way it is. It appears authoritative from the content, but it isn't verified in line with our standards. I wonder if it comes form a time when Wikipedia was less precise? We need to get it up there with the best articles. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:12, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Best All-Rounder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070310180409/http://www.rttc.org.uk:80/ to http://www.rttc.org.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)