Talk:Botafogo de Futebol e Regatas

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Botafogo de Futebol e Regatas article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Football: Brazil Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brazilian football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Brazil: Sports Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sports in Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Archives

no archives yet (create)

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Help to improve articles related to Brazil in Simple English Wikipedia. If you are not fluent in English, that is the right place.

Big clubs of Brazil[edit]

In the section "Rivals", the three main rivals of Botafogo are given, while a list of all the other large clubs from Brazil is also mentioned. This list includes Bahia, probably because it is one of the founding members of Clube dos 13. I removed Bahia, as this is not enough to classify the team as one of the big ones. Clube dos 13 has, nowadays, several other clubs that are not listed here. There are clearly 12 dominant clubs in Brazil, while to include Bahia would make fans of Coritiba, Atlético Paranaense, Sport Recife, etc to protest the inclusion of their clubs of comparable size to Bahia. Besides, the section is made for Botafogo's rivals, that are mainly the three other large clubs from Rio de Janeiro City. The mention of other national big clubs implies softer but also important rivalries, which is only true to 8 of the 9 clubs mentioned. Botafogo has no big rivalry to Bahia, and a game against them is not much different than a game against Vitória, while a game against any of the other 8, such as Cruzeiro, Palmeiras or Grêmio, has indeed a considerable degree of rivalry. 177.182.217.21 (talk) 03:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you are right. --Carioca (talk) 19:35, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Botafogo beach[edit]

Why does "Botafogo beach" redirect here, rather than to the Botafogo page? 98.118.181.161 (talk) 02:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the redirects. Botafogo beach and Botafogo Beach now redirect to Botafogo. Thanks. Regards, --Carioca (talk) 18:44, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jersey???[edit]

Black and white by Juventus??? One huge problem, Juventus use this jersey before 1904 (first Pink by 6 years and later pink & black by 1 year)and Botafogo is founded in 1904!!!!!!!!!!!!--186.62.157.165 (talk) 02:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Botafogo is a neighborhood of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. Nobody who joined the discussion supported using that name to signify *just* the football club. EdJohnston (talk) 19:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{requested move/dated}}

Botafogo de Futebol e Regatas → Botafogo
Botafogo → ?

– The football club Botafogo qualifies for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:COMMONNAME. However, I do not know what would be an appropriate page name for the Botafogo neighborhood. I suggest Botafogo (bairro), Botafogo (neighborhood) or Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro but other suggestions are welcome. MicroX (talk) 21:04, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. MicroX (talk) 21:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Looking at Botafogo (disambiguation) gives me a feeling that Botafogo de Futebol e Regatas is not WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, as there is a whole lot of articles that is named Botafogo. This one might be the most viewed topic, but not the primary topic. I would support moving the article about the town to Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, but oppose moving the article about the football club. Mentoz86 (talk) 21:57, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro would be standard format. (This does not mean I support or oppose the move) -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 00:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - not PRIMARYTOPIC, and we do not use COMMONNAME for football clubs, the debacle that was the Inter Milan RM aside. Giant Snowman 09:54, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator comment – After reading some of the opposing arguments, would anyone support redirecting Botafogo to Botafogo de Futebol e Regatas and the original article about the Botafogo neighborhood be moved to Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro? --MicroX (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Mentoz86 and GiantSnowman have said exactly what I had planned to. Number 5 7 13:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - The term is too generic to refer specifically to the football club. – Pee Jay 15:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Botafogo de Futebol e Regatas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Botafogo de Futebol e Regatas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]