Talk:Blossoming Lotus

Food and drink: Foodservice Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Hawaii Low‑importance

	Hawaii portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Portland, Oregon may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Notability[edit]

I wouldn't tag this again, but I think it barely meets the notability criteria, and I think it would be tough to get this to pass an Afd in its current state. 4 references don't automatically confer notability. Is there any national coverage? See WP:NOTE and WP:CORP for more information. Also, I can see why someone would have put the {{advert}} tag back because of the link to the vegan fusion book, which is more about the book than the restaurant. Perhaps there needs to be a separate article on vegan fusion cuisine? But only if it's a notable phenomenon. Thanks. Katr67 23:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see [1], [2], [3], [4]. This restaurant meets and exceeds the notability guidelines in its class and category, and the book describes the restaurant, its philosophy, and the recipes it uses. The book could be incorporated as an inline reference, but it's far more neutral to rely upon secondary sources as is the case with the current article. —Viriditas | Talk 23:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I don't plan to take this to Afd or anything, but I've seen how those things tend to go. I still don't see much but a lot of woowoo sources (I know because I'm a bit woowoo myself) but I see they were apparently in Condé Nast Traveler, which helps, as it's a bit more mainstream (meaning higher circulation). Just keep the above links in mind in case the notability tag returns. The question to ask is "What makes this particular vegan restaurant so special?" I've eaten in some and even worked in a few, and not a single one of them was notable enough to merit a Wikipedia article. Is it the vegan equivalent of Greens (gosh don't use that article as an example of how to do references) or Moosewood? Katr67 00:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent criticism. I'm going to rewrite the article to address it instead of posting a long-winded response. :) —Viriditas | Talk 02:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like it just meets the WP:CORP notability guidelines. It would easily make it with the cookbook references, but those go towards establishing the books notability more than the restuarant. To be on the safe side I'd try to find an article in say Willamette Week or The Oregonian, or a Hawaii paper (I know there is one there now but its an award so I doubt it has "substantial coverage") that covers it in depth the way the SF paper and Mercury paper cover it. As it is now Im sure it would survive any AFD, but with a couple more sources no one will even try. Aboutmovies 09:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm trying to add them right now. I've got Hinduism Today, a review in The Call (Woonsocket) (a R.I. paper), an article in the Los Angeles Daily News, and a review in Frommer's that calls them the "Best Place to Eat" on Kauai". A defunct Hawaii magazine named Zento wrote two articles about them, calling the Lotus, ""one of the most innovative and exceptional Vegan restaurants in the world", and author Bob Kasher describes the Lotus as "a pioneer in organic gourmet Vegan cuisine...one of the best places for Vegan and Vegetarian food in the islands." The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times have online reviews about the Lotus, but they appear to be feeds from travel guides. The strange thing is that I recall first reading about the Lotus in the print version of the NYT, but I can't seem to find anything in the archives. That has me stumped. —Viriditas | Talk 10:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated tag[edit]

Just a note, this article needs updating. I'm not sure the restaurant on Kauai is still in business. Also need a check on the other one as well. Viriditas (talk) 09:16, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Blossoming Lotus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:55, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BLV2002[edit]

BLV2002 Please let's discuss this edit here on the talk page. You've twice now removed an assertion that had a source and inserted one that does not. We need a source for that edit. --valereee (talk) 16:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]