Talk:Biomedical Research Center

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Ccpoka1971 (talk) 14:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know the information in the article is accurate? // Timothy :: talk 16:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Timoth >> There are sufficient number of references put in the article to prove the facts >> if I find ambiguous text, I will remove it or re-phrase it. Ccpoka1971 (talk) 07:34, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You label it for speedy delete, but assisting us on how to improve it would be appreciated. Most notes put in the page cannot be understood, but will explain few things based on your notes:

- the neutrality of this article is disputed. why? Multiple sources of information are put and these sources are totally independent of the subject.

- This article contains content that is written like an advertisement.. what is the prove, please? there is no single word used to promote that business or a product. Al information are facts with cited sources and very similar to many institutes on Wikipedia.

- This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. (March 2023) - How did you come to this conclusion, please? What source of information one should use if shouldn't be from newspapers, websites, files? Give us examples to assist us.

Comment I think its obvious that the authors of the article are affiliated with the subject. This is fine, but you need to declare your affiliation publicly. The fastest way this article could be deleted is if the ip addresses creating this article come back to the institution or parent and for the affiliation not to have been disclosed. If I'm wrong, you have nothing to worry about, but if I am correct and you don't disclose your affiliation, then that is a significant problem for the article.

The heavy reliance on the parent organization for information is naturally biased, You need to find independent, reliable secondary sources for the article (academic journals are the standard for organizations and content of this type). I'll give it some cleanup time, but this needs cleaned up. If you need assistance, submit the article to WP:GOCE, which is probably the best way to keep the information from being deleted. Using some primary sources for basic objective facts is fine, but not for other content. The biased wording needs to be removed, unless it can be verified from independent reliable secondary sources.

I will assume you are from the institution and therefore have access to academic journal databases and know how to perform research, you should replaced the non-independent biased sources with independent sources from academic journals.

For more information please read WP:RS, WP:V, WP:Independent, and questions can be answered at WP:TEAHOUSE. // Timothy :: talk 08:07, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag (May 2023)[edit]

Editor User:Ccpoka1971 (a SPA account) hasn't responded to a COI request. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:46, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]